New Delhi: The Supreme Court Wednesday held consensual sex between adults of the same gender an offence, leaving the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community dejected.
Setting aside the Delhi High Court verdict of 2009, the apex court bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice S.J. Mukhopadhayay said there was no constitutional room for change in Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.
Section 377 of the IPC holds that same-gender sexual relationship is against the order of the nature and is an offence. The apex couyrt by its ruling Wednesday upheld the constitutional validity of the section.
The Delhi High Court by its verdict, which the apex court has now set aside, had decriminalised the sexual relationship between consenting adults of the same gender under Section 377.
Law Minister Kapil Sibal told reporters outside parliament: "It is the prerogative of the Supreme Court to judge the constitutionality and validity of the law. The opinion of the Supreme Court must be respected by the government. They have exercised their prerogative, we shall exercise ours."
Gay activist Ashok Row Kavi said that with this verdict, "we are back to square one".
"But we will fight for our rights. It is essential to note that this has nothing to do with morality and religion."
"We are just asking for inclusive rights in the society. This is just a type of orientation a lot of people are involved in...," he added.
Restoring back Section 377 under the statute book, the Supreme Court, referring to the Attorney General, said that the government could, if it so desired, amend the law.
The apex court verdict upholding Section 377 came 21 months after it had reserved its verdict in March 2012.
Activist Sohini Ghosh described the judgment as "not just a betrayal to the LGBT community, but a betrayal to the values that are enshrined in the constitution".
"...The only thing that I want to say is that fight will go on, and we will fight till the bitter end," she said.
Pallav Patankar from the Humsafar Trust feels that the verdict is a big blow to the community.
"The Supreme Court has put the decision back to parliament, and the reason it went to the SC was because parliament refused to discuss issues related to alternate sexuality. There is a need to address the issue...," he said.
Comments
| Quick linksNews
National
International
Regional
Politics
Education & Career
Business
Science & Technology
Health
Views & Analysis
The Funny Side
© 2012 Awaz Multimedia & Publications. All rights reserved.
Arvind Kejriwal refuses to back BJPKejriwal instead advised the Bharatiya Janata Party, which with 31 seats is the single largest group in the 70-member house, to take power with the help of the Congress, which has eight legislators. ... More
Also Read: Prepare for fresh election in Delhi, says BJP
Parliament disrupted over 2G spectrum, TelanganaIn the Lok Sabha, the house was first adjourned till 12 noon, following protests over various issues that also included proposed creation of a Telangana state and the Joint Parliametnet..... More
It is true that in Kashmir today there are many tendencies, which vary from asking for total independence, Azadi to Autonomy. There will hardly be any popular support for debating or abolishing article 370 as such at broad layers. Difficult to say how many fall in which...... More
Mehmoodur Rehman committee ReportMehmoodur Rehman committee strengthens Muslim claim on Ismail Yusuf land
"We are fighting with the government as well as in court for the possession of Ismail Yusuf College and its adjoining land since last fifty years. After the recommendation made by Dr. Mehmoodur Rehman committee we are sure the .... More
Also Read: Muslim women group demands ban on 'Triple Talaq in one sitting'
