 |
Muslim
reservation due to backwardness, not because of religion: Syed
Shahabuddin:
“The argument raised by
certain vested interest groups against giving ....Read
Full
Govt.
should stop playing game with Muslims:
On the way to MGM ground in Aurangabad on January 28 yesterday where a rally was organised
to press the government
....Read
Full
|
|
New Delhi: Preparations are in
full swing for the national meet on Muslim reservation to be held in
the national capital on February 10.
The convention is
organised by
Joint Committee of Muslim Organisations for
Empowerment and National Movement for Muslim Reservation, both
headed by ex-MP Syed Shahabuddin.
The objective of
the convention is to build up Muslim unity & coordination of all
marginalized groups that would contribute towards crystallization of
political support for implementation of the Rangnath Mishra Report.
The Report is likely to come for discussion in the Parliament in the
Budget Session.
The second
important purpose of the Meet is to mobilize public opinion by
responding to the criticism of the report as divisive, as
encouragement for conversion of Hindu SC’s to Islam and
Christianity, and paving the way for another division of the
country. The Meet has therefore to formulate its strategy as well as
to chalk out a democratic and peaceful Programme of Action in order
to press the government & political parties to consider the Report
seriously & to convince them that the masses are basically secular
and believe inequality and justice for all and that Muslim
Reservation has today become the litmus test for secularism.
Nearly
500 activists from all across the country are expected to
participate in the convention that will be inaugurated by renowned
Muslim scholar and Chancellor Jamia Hamdard Saiyid Hamid. First
session of the convention would be chaired by eminent economist and
former Member-Secretary Justice Sachar Committee Dr. Abusaleh
Shariff whereas the second session would be presided over by Zafar
Saifullah IAS (Retired), former Cabinet Secretary to the Govt. of
India.
Besides various
groups in the country, the
convention would also be attended by delegates from all known Muslim
organization like Jamat-e-Islami Hind (JIH), Jamiatul Ulema (JUH),
Jamat-e-Ahlehadees, AIMC, AISC. The Popular front of India based in
Karnataka, the Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Khazagam, All India
Federation of Muslim Backward Classes in Mumbai, the Muslim
Reservation Movement in UP and Milli Muttaheda Mahaz, Bihar will
also participate in the convention. Some of the Muslim MPs and
political leaders belonging to different political parties have also
given their nod for the convention.
Many Muslim
organizations have been active in the field for the last one year.
Some have even launched state-wise or nation-wide yatras to
propagate the message of the Mishra Report. The Meet will press the
government to act on the promises and repeated proclamations of
inclusive development, partnership in governance and social justice
in distribution of assets and fruits of progress.
The National
Commission on Religious and Linguistic Minorities with Justice
Ranganath Mishra, former Chief Justice of India, as the Chairman was
notified in October, 20004. The Commission submitted its Report in
May 2007. Interestingly, the Government took two and a half years to
table it in the Parliament and that too, without any Action Taken
Report or even Comments on the Recommendation of the Commission. The
Recommendation, unique and unprecedented since Independence has
therefore been received with enthusiasm & hope by the Muslim
community. In the past, the draft constitution was changed at the
last stage to deprive Muslims of reservation. Neither the Mandal
Commission nor the Gopal Singh Panel Report nor the Prime Minister’s
15 Point Programme, in several incarnations, have made much
difference to the social, educational & economic situation of the
Community.
The great
contribution of the Mishra Commission is that while successive
government have recognized the fact of relative backwardness of the
Muslim Community, as did the Mandal Commission the Sachar Report,
and promised ‘due’ or ‘reasonable’ or ‘possible’ share in government
jobs to the Muslims or to show special consideration’ to them in the
field of public recruitment & education, Mishra Commission has for
the first time quantified the Muslim quota in term of 15 % for all
minorities, of which 10 % exclusively for the Muslims.
The second great
breakthrough by the Commission is the Recommendation that the
Constitution (Schedule Caste) Order, 1950, which the Commission has
found anti-secular and unconstitutional be amended Clause 3, which
originally confined Schedule Caste status to Hindus, be deleted. The
Commission has recommended that there should be no religious
discrimination in the provision of reservation to those who come
from the same stock and have occupational parity & Muslim &
Christian Dalits should be included in the SC Lists.
The third
break-through of the Commission is that it has not only proposed
reservation for religious minorities under Article 15 (4) but going
beyond it to Article 16(4) for reservation in public employment
without subjecting backwardness to any qualification.
Fourthly, it has
allowed reservation for the minorities as one of the ‘weaker
section’ under Article 46 of the Constitution.
The Commission has
proposed other important legal and administrative modalities for
uplifting the minorities. It has proposed that reservation should
not be ad-hoc and that the relative level of backwardness of all
groups should be determined through development-oriented Census,
based on socio-economic parameters and that Supreme Court lay the
guideline for all groups and sub-groups. Reservation quota would
thus not be an exercise in official charity but the performance of a
constitutional duty.
The Commission has
also questioned the correctness of the Supreme Court in laying down
a Ceiling of 50 % on total reservation on ground of so-called merit
and efficiency and indicated that a uniform ceiling for a country in
which there a vast differences in the number of backward-classes and
their levels of backwardness from state to state is not correct.
|