Contempt of court only arises on disobedience
of order: Apex court
Saturday, October 16, 2010 08:39:32 AM,
IANS
|
New Delhi:
The Supreme Court has held that the proceedings against a person
accused of contempt of court could not be initiated merely on
speculation, assumptions and inference drawn from the fact and
circumstances of the case, but only on "wilful disobedience" of
the court's order.
"In our considered opinion", the apex court bench of Justice J.M.
Panchal and Justice Gyan Sudha Mishra said the "contempt of a
civil nature can be held to have been made out only if there has
been a wilful disobedience of the (court) order...."
Speaking for the bench, Justice Mishra said that even though there
may be disobedience, "yet if the same does not reflect that it has
been a conscious and wilful disobedience, a case for contempt
cannot be held to have been made out". The judgment was made
available Friday.
"In fact, if an order is capable of more than one interpretation
giving rise to variety of consequences, non-compliance of the same
cannot be held to be wilful disobedience of the order so as to
make out a case of contempt entailing the serious consequence
including imposition of punishment," the judgment said.
However, when the courts are confronted with a question as to
whether a given situation could be treated to be a case of wilful
disobedience or a case of a lame excuse in order to subvert its
compliance, it would depend on the facts and circumstances of the
individual cases.
The Contempt of Court Act, 1971 clearly postulates and emphasises
that the ingredients of the wilful disobedience must be there
before any one can hauled for the charge of contempt of a civil
nature, the apex court said, setting aside the initiation of
contempt proceedings by the single judge of the Jaipur bench of
Rajasthan High Court against its Deputy Registrar (Judicial)
Dinesh Kumar Gupta.
The high court initiated the contempt proceedings on the
assumption that Gupta sat over the case file where in an inquiry
was ordered against the judge of a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
at Jaipur.
This tribunal, presided over by S.K. Bansal, had awarded
compensation to Kaushalya Devi and others from the United India
Insurance in 2001. When the matter came up for hearing before the
high court in 2006, Bansal had already retired.
Setting aside the high court order directing the initiation of
contempt proceedings against Gupta, the judgment said that the
high court judge had "inferred and assumed erroneously that the
appellant (Gupta) had the intention of obstructing the
administration of justice".
Gupta could not attract the charge of shielding Bansal, who had
retired in 2003, as he only took over deputy registrar in 2005,
the apex court judgment said, adding initiation of the contempt
proceeding against Gupta "is based on a wholly wrong premise based
on unsustainable and unfounded facts which cannot be treated
sufficient material so as to initiate contempt proceeding...."
|
Home |
Top of the Page |
 |
Comment on this article |
|
|
 |
|
News Pick |
Former UK envoy calls for arms embargo against Israel
Former British ambassador Lord Wright Thursday called for an EU
arms embargo to be imposed against Israel, warning that its
refusal to freeze illegal settlement activities is “genuine
threat” to peace. “This » |
Nothing wrong with Omar's Kashmir accession
remarks: Krishna
External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna
Friday said he found "nothing objectionable" in Jammu and Kashmir
Chief Minister Omar Abdullah's remark that the state had acceded to
and not merged with the
» |
Young Muslims in India plan own Personal Law Board
Challenging the self-allotting authority of the All India Muslim
Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) and disappointed by the way it
functions, some Delhi based lawyers, activists, journalists,
Madrasa alumni
» |
AMU off campus centers get President approval
The Aligarh Muslim University Vice Chancellor, Prof. P. K. Abdul
Azis while addressing a press conference expressed happiness as it
is a moment of exultation for the entire AMU community as the
Visitor of Aligarh Muslim
» |
Humans will need resources of two earths by
2030 to survive
Human demands on natural resources
have doubled in under 50 years and are now outstripping what the
planet can provide. Consequently, at current rates of consumption
of resources, humankind will
»
|
No one wants Bihar's 'Osama' this time
Meraj Khalid Noor, a young businessman who campaigned in the 2005
assembly polls and was dubbed Bihar's Osama bin Laden due to his
uncanny resemblance to the Al Qaeda chief, finds himself unwanted
by
»
|
|
|
|
|
|