Netanyahu and Obama: What's the difference?
Saturday June 04, 2011 09:37:33 AM,
Chandra Muzaffar
|
Two speeches made by a President and
a Prime Minister within the short span of three days confirm what
we have known all along: the US and Israeli governments have no
interest in a just solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Let us begin with the second speech, delivered by Israeli Prime
Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, to a joint session of the US
Congress on May 24 2011. Not unexpectedly, Netanyahu adopted an
intransigent, belligerent position on all the critical issues that
divide Israelis from Palestinians. He reiterated that there will
be no return to the 1967 borders. In more precise language, he
wants the 500,000 Israeli settlers who now occupy large tracts of
the West Bank seized in the 1967 war to remain where they are.
This means that in terms of actual land area the Palestinian state
of the future will be much less than even the 22 per cent of
historical Palestine, comprising the West Bank and Gaza, that many
Palestinian and Arab leaders were prepared to accept as a
settlement for the sake of peace. The Palestinian state will be
nothing more than a Bantustan, a’la apartheid South Africa which
is what Netanyahu and other like-minded Israeli, American and
European
leaders have wanted all along.
Netanyahu was also adamant about Jerusalem remaining “the united
capital of Israel” --- thus rejecting once again the proposal made
by a number of advocates of a two state solution that East
Jerusalem should be the capital of a future Palestinian state. He
went on to fabricate a blatant lie about how “Israel’s sovereignty
over Jerusalem” is “the only time that Jews, Christians and
Muslims could worship freely, could have unfettered access to
their holy sites” Apart from the fact that Muslims, and to a
limited extent, Christians are hampered and hindered by all sorts
of restrictions and obstacles in carrying out their religious
duties in the holy city today, Netanyahu forgets the irrefutable
truth that it was during long periods of Muslim rule from 638 to
1099 and then again from 1187 to 1916 that Jerusalem was a
hospitable home to the three Abrahamic faiths. This also exposes
the hollowness of the argument that Netanyahu and others have made
on other occasions that Jerusalem has always been a “Jewish City.”
The Israeli Prime Minister also insisted in his usual arrogant
manner that Palestinian refugees should not be allowed to return
to their native land --- the historical Palestine that Israel has
taken over since 1948. In other words, they cannot exercise their
inalienable right under international law. “If they so choose”
Netanyahu asserted, they could settle in the new Palestinian
state, or more accurately, in Bantustan.
There were many other outrageous statements in his speech to the
US Congress which was received by standing ovations 31 times! He
indulged in half-truths about the partition of Palestine in 1947.
He gave the erroneous impression that the Palestinians and other
Arabs are antagonistic towards the Jewish presence in their
neighbourhood when in fact their opposition is directed against
the Zionist colonisation of their homeland which has led to their
dispossession and oppression. He made the ludicrous claim that the
Arab citizens of Israel are the only Arabs who enjoy real
democratic rights when everyone knows that it is a crime for them
to express a basic human right--- their right of
self-determination. He painted a frightening picture of the danger
that a so-called “nuclear armed” Iran poses to the Middle East and
the entire world when it is common knowledge that Israel is the
only state in the region that possesses a substantial nuclear
weapons
arsenal.
Contrary to the impression created by mainstream media analysts,
President Barack Obama’s speech to the AIPAC (American-Israeli
Public Affairs Committee) Policy Conference 2011 on May 22 2011
was very much in line with what Netanyahu said two days later. He
not only reiterated his endorsement of Israel as a Jewish State
but also provided iron-clad guarantees that the US will enhance
Israel’s security. He condemned the democratically elected Hamas
as a terrorist organisation and had the temerity to describe the
“the recent agreement between Fatah and Hamas” as “an enormous
obstacle to peace.” In what was certainly music to Israeli ears,
he berated Iran for its alleged nuclear weapons programme. He went
out of the way to assure Israel that he would oppose any attempt
to seek recognition for an independent Palestinian state through
the United Nations.
Most of all, he emphasised that the “borders of Israel and
Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed
swaps…” He elaborated that it means “that the parties themselves
--- Israelis and Palestinians--- will negotiate a border that is
different than the one that existed on June 4 1967.” This is
exactly what Netanyahu has been saying---- except that he uses
much more robust language to articulate his rejection of the
internationally recognised 1967 borders as “indefensible.”
If Obama differed from Netanyahu it is only in the advice he
offered Israel to hasten towards peace with the Palestinians
partly because demographic realities were changing, partly because
of the Arab Uprising and partly because governments in various
parts of the world were getting impatient with the absence of a
peace process. But it is advice that lost its significance in
Obama’s more determined bid to appear to be in complete tandem
with Netanyahu and the powerful Israeli-Zionist lobby in his
country.
The Obama Netanyahu speeches, coming as they do in the wake of the
Arab Uprising and the Fatah-Hamas pact, should convince --- if
further convincing is needed at all---the Palestinians, other
Arabs and advocates of a just peace elsewhere that negotiations
with Israel through the US will only result in greater humiliation
and loss of dignity for the Palestinians. They should –as they
have begun to do--- draw inspiration from the Arab Uprising and
mobilise the people in the region and from other parts of the
world for a massive non-violent struggle for the restoration of
the dignity of the Palestinians and other victims of Zionist
oppression and US helmed hegemony. There was a hint of this on May
15 2011 when Palestinians and other Arabs launched peaceful
protests against the Israeli regime from Lebanon, Syria and Egypt
in remembrance of the catastrophe (nakba) that has befallen them
as a consequence of the establishment of the state of Israel in
1948.
Tel Aviv responded to the protests with bullets killing a number
of protesters.(Incidentally, Obama, the champion of non-violent
protest, made no reference at all to the nakba massacre in his
speech). But the brave protesters have vowed to continue the
struggle.
Dr. Chandra Muzaffar
is President of the International Movement for a Just World (JUST)
and Professor of Global Studies in Universiti Sains Malaysia.
|
Home |
Top of the Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
Stories |
Ramdev to begin fast Saturday as talks fail
Yoga guru Baba Ramdev Friday declared
he was going ahead with his hunger strike against corruption and
black money from Saturday
»
RSS behind Baba Ramdev's fast,
says Digvijay Singh
Thousands come, drawn to Ramdev more
than his cause
PM meets president, discusses
Ramdev's proposed hunger strike |
|
Most
Read |

At least 25 dead, Syria demonstrators reach
capital; Total internet blackout
Syrian
security forces shot dead at least 25 people while dispersing tens
of thousands of demonstrators in the central city of Hama today,
activists said, as anti-regime
»
|
Yemeni President wounded in shelling on presidential palace in Sana'a
Yemeni
President Ali Abdullah Saleh and several high-ranking officials
suffered injuries in shelling on the presidential palace in Sana'a
Friday, Xinhua quoted a security official as saying.
Saleh was slightly injured while Yemeni Prime Minister Ali Mujawar,
Deputy Prime Minister
»
|
|
News Pick |
India, Pakistan need more time to resolve
Siachen dispute: Antony
With India
and Pakistan agreeing to continue their talks on the Siachen
Glacier, Defence Minister A.K. Antony Friday said both
»
|
Mamata effect: Salaries on 1st, clean-up
drives in hospitals
Suparna Nag couldn't believe her eyes
when she updated her bank passbook on June 1. In her 15 years of
career as a teacher in West Bengal, it was the first time that she
got her salary on time, and that too just
»
|
Tamil Nadu announces freebies, welfare schemes
Tamil Nadu
Governor S.S. Barnala Friday announced a slew of welfare measures,
including free laptops, green housing scheme for poor and direct
crediting
»
Tamil Nadu to 'nationalise' cable TV
|
Omani nationals walk 250 km for drug abuse
awareness
Two young Omani nationals in a bid to create awareness on drug
abuse in the country have walked a distance of 250 km.
Khamis al Hatali and Helmi al Kindy were supported in their
endeavour by the Al Hayat Association, an
»
|

Sukanya Roy wins America's coveted
spelling bee crown
Spelling
tongue twister "cymotrichous", Greek for having wavy hair, Indian
American Sukanya Roy has won the 2011 Scripps National
»
|
|
Picture of the Day |
 |
The Prime
Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh addressing the Joint Session of
Ethiopian Parliament, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on May 26,
2011. |
|
|
|