The house was first adjourned on the issue till 11.22 a.m. and later till noon.

The issue came up soon after the house assembled for the day. Shiv Sena member Manohar Joshi objected to the use of the words "saffron terrorism" by the home minister and sought a clarification from the government. He was joined by BJP members.

Ansari repeatedly urged the members to allow question hour to proceed and adjourned the house till 11.22 a.m.

After the house met following the first adjournment, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley said he was conveying the grievance of a large section of the house over the use of the term.

He said Chidambaram should clarify his remarks and desist from using such expressions.

The BJP leader said the country had seen various crises over the past three decades, including militancy in Punjab, and the effort had been to keep away references to a community.

He said Chidambaram utilised his speech to "say something he should not have".

The BJP leader said instead of focusing on tackling unrest in Kashmir and the Maoist problem, the home minister was talking about an imaginary phenomenon of terror that does not exist.

Soon after Jaitley's remarks, Chairman Hamid Ansari said a short duration discussion on internal security had been listed in the business and asked the members to let question hour proceed.

Lok Janshakti Party (LJP) leader Ram Vilas Paswan said Chidambaram had made the remarks as a responsible minister and the phenomenon of "saffron terror" existed.

He demanded a ban on the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and the Bajrang Dal.

BJP members protested over Paswan's remarks, resulting in din in the house. The chairman urged the members to resume their seats but as the protests continued, the house was adjourned till noon.

In his speech Wednesday at the meeting of state police chiefs, Chidambaram cautioned security and intelligence officials against continuing attempts of militants to infilitrate into India as well as the recently uncovered phenomenon of "saffron terrorism".