India’s largest minority population
lives in poverty and socio-economic exclusion even after 62 years of
Independence. Muslims live in ghettos across the country with a
persistent feeling of fear and insecurity.
According to the Sachar Committee,
around 4% of Muslims have managed to become graduates; Muslims have
a very thin presence in banks, universities and in Government jobs.
This sort of socio-economic
backwardness could not have taken place overnight. Successive
Governments have failed in their responsibility to enable Muslims to
participate in India’s democracy. The nexus between the vote
managers posing as community leaders and the supposedly secular
political parties has ensured that the Muslim community remains
mired in poverty, illiteracy, backwardness and insecurity. Living
with communalism has become the fate of the ordinary Muslim. Since
1947 the community has been pushed to the margins, so much so that
some experts feel that they are the Dalits of tomorrow. Worse,
unlike the Dalits, Muslims do not have any legacy of social
mobilisation and political consciousness. The Dalits were fortunate
to have visionaries like B.R. Ambedkar and Jotiba Phule. Muslims
have no leadership worth the name; and whoever claims to be a
community leader should own up to the all-round failure.
There are two important reasons, among
others, for this dismal situation. One, the failure of the state to
fulfil its welfare responsibility towards citizens in spite of the
guarantees given by the Constitution; and two, the failure of the
Muslim leadership, if one believes it exists.
We are all aware how our democracy is
marred by a corrupt and insincere polity which has no interest in
the welfare of any of its excluded citizens, be it the Dalits, the
Adivasis, the Muslims, the labour or the women. In the case of
Muslims this is coupled with the failure to safeguard their lives
and properties from communal violence. The discrimination faced by
Muslims because of communal mindsets, particularly among the police
and sections of the bureaucracy, is a commonly lived reality. Why
else would the Sachar Committee recommend a full-fledged
sensitisation programme? The community has little or no access to
welfare schemes largely because of this communal mindset, apart from
a general lack of education within the community. The rise of
communal and fascist political parties has added to Muslim fear and
insecurity.
The second reason — lack of leadership
— is equally important and has far-reaching implications.
It is agreed that in a diverse country
like ours Muslims are not a monolithic community. There are Urdu
speaking Muslims, just as there are Tamil Muslims and Bengali
Muslims. There are Sunnis, Shias, low castes and OBCs. And then
there are men, women and the youth including girls and boys. Apart
from faith there is another common factor that has acquired a huge
importance in recent times. It is about how they are perceived by
the larger world as a community: “Muslims are dirty; Muslims are
backward; Muslims are not patriotic; Muslims are terrorists.”
While the challenges faced by the
community are of Herculean proportions, the fractured Muslim
leadership neither has the commitment nor the competence to address
these problems. They are obsessed with non-substantive and seemingly
emotive issues. Unfortunately, it suits various Governments that no
real demands are made for education, jobs, financial assistance,
health facilities, security, etc. All that the latter have to do is
to pander to these dubious elements and thus “take care” of almost
15% of the Indian population. The community has paid a huge price
because of this. The leadership is not challenged and the Government
gets away without fulfilling its welfare obligations.
Why does the Muslim leadership have to
be of a particular variety? On issues concerning Muslims, why does
the Government consult primarily those who have religious
identities? Why does the mainstream media concentrate on
highlighting the opinion of a few men with beards and skull-caps?
Why do all these people have to be men? Why has everybody forgotten
about the Muslim women who comprise 50% of the community? How can
any opinion that leaves out half the community be relied upon? No
wonder the Muslim leadership has failed to find solutions to the
pressing issues.
As for the question mark on the
patriotism of Muslims, the question mark is actually on the
Indianness of some of the self-styled guardians of the Indian
nation. The truth is that Muslims are as Indian as anybody else. The
debate on this issue is humbug generated by vested interests clad
either in saffron or green. Are you a Muslim first or an Indian is a
non-substantive question raised with mala fide intentions and is
best ignored.
In spite of the prevailing situation
there has been a sure and steady stirring within the community.
There are ordinary citizens who want to do something for the
community and society. They are teachers, students, businesspersons,
professionals, and most importantly, women — people who have
multiple identities like most other Indians. Thousands of ordinary
Muslim women spread across the country are working tirelessly
towards meaningful and responsible participation in India’s
democracy. They believe in the values of equality, justice and
democracy enshrined in the Constitution. They are working to make
democracy a reality. Most of them have struggled to survive
difficult personal and social circumstances and are now standing by
others like them. Gujarat 2002 is a dark blot on the history of
independent India, as is 1984. But most people may not be aware of a
positive fallout of 2002. The way the riot-affected women of Gujarat
have fought the battle for justice is historic. It is a pity that
our patriarchal leaders do not feel the need to talk about this.
“Hume insaf chahiye, madad nahi [We want justice, not help],” was an
assertion we heard in Gujarat repeatedly. Even as the larger
community was dejected and resigned to its fate as almost
second-class citizens, it was the women who continued the fight for
justice. They said, “Can’t we go to the Supreme Court? Can’t we go
to Parliament?” When innocent boys were picked up under the
draconian POTA, thousands of them came out on the streets of
Ahmedabad and bravely demanded the arrest of the culprits, some of
whom were sitting members in the State Government. Similar incidents
took place in Mumbai following the 1992 riots, and in other places.
The story has only grown in 2009.
Thousands of Muslim women activists are struggling to bring to the
fore the community’s sane, alternative and progressive voice. These
women are demanding a comprehensive implementation of the Sachar
Committee recommendations, even as they are working to disseminate
its findings. They are asking Government officers what they have
done for them. They are using Right to Information to enforce
accountability in various Government institutions. Slowly but
clearly a collective feminine voice is emerging: we too are human
beings and want to be recognised. We want jobs, we want schools for
our children, we want a life of dignity. We want security and
safety. We want respect and we want to respect all. We want a world
where there is space for all, irrespective of religion, caste and
sex. We want freedom for ourselves and our sisters and brothers. We
won’t tolerate the diktat of some self-appointed leaders. We oppose
them as much as we oppose the Hindutva communalists. We are
determined to fight the communalists and the patriarchal fanatics
with equal resolution, because for us it is a question of life and
death. God has endowed us with the ability to think and made us
capable of making our own decisions; and we make decisions that are
in our interests and in the interests of our families, our society
and the world. We will not tolerate injustice and we will not allow
injustice to take place around us. We will fight for our rights. We
will carry out our responsibilities as the citizens of our country
and participate in the affairs of the world.
It is not religion that has treated
Muslim women unjustly, but the supposedly religious men. The Muslim
woman has been treated unfairly by the distorted interpretations of
Islam’s religious texts by some ulemas. What is most abominable is
that these ulemas have made it a habit of dispersing injustice in
the name of religion. I, for one, like thousand others, do not want
to get into the details about which line, which verse, which chapter
prevents a woman from doing this or that. I refuse to play this
power game. I do not have to be a scholar to know that my God is
just; I do not have to go to a seminary to know that I am as equal
as anyone else in front of my God. I do not need dubious experts to
tell me what is right and what is wrong for me, for I rely on my
common sense and my heart. It is a matter between me and my God and
I refuse to recognise the middlemen.
Isn’t Islam a religion of justice,
equality, kindness and humanity? How can then some Muslims be more
equal than others? How can Muslim men be more equal than Muslim
women? How can privileges be heaped on one section while another
section is excluded? This is discrimination, this is injustice. And
it is common knowledge that discrimination and injustice are
un-Islamic.
Zakia Soman is a founder
member of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan.
She can be contacted on
zakiasoman@yahoo.com
|