Millions of pounds have been wasted
on anti-extremism projects that did not produce any security
benefits. But we can afford to throw money at bankers. I think we
should axe funding to our variety of (sometimes illegal) wars in
other countries. Fewer bombs and perhaps they'd been more money
for the NHS and the likes. Why are these specific groups allowed
to suckle at the public tit? And what's the message the government
is sending? "If we give you money, will you promise not to blow us
up?" This is not counter-terrorism work. This is appeasement.
Let's call a spade a spade. I feel that this Tory government is
edging closer and closer to a police state in it approach to
dealing with terrorism - and especially Muslim terrorists. In Nazi
Germany and Stalinist Russia, people were encouraged to spy on
each other: would this government have us act in the same way?
Will we have shown trials where one neighbour denounces another as
being a member of a proscribed organisation? Probably too extreme,
but who knows? The key challenge is to ensure that healthcare
workers can identify the signs that someone is vulnerable to
radicalisation, interpret those signs correctly and access the
relevant support," the document is expected to say. And what are
these signs supposed to be? "Well he's grown a beard which was the
first red flag you see. Oh and I heard a ticking noise whilst he
was in the room. Crafty little bugger tried to tell me it was my
wall clock" Thersea May and Dame Pauline Neville-Jones are utterly
insane. Yes beards are a sure sign of something untoward. What are
they hiding?
Our politicians need to pay a visit to the doctor themselves, or
maybe the psychiatrists would be more appropriate. And will they
be able to provide some sort of medication to combat
radicalisation? Will Aspirins and a lie down do the trick? Theresa
may suggest that universities are breeding extremism. She herself
is not helping the cause and in fact making it worse. When she got
into her position, a small bigoted group influenced her to ban an
Islamic speaker Dr. Zakir Naik who was branded as a terrorist when
in fact he did an entire 2 hour presentation as to why Islam does
to promote or advocate terrorism. He explicitly stated that it is
un-Islamic and that what the do is wrong even stating that the
Quran says' killing of one innocent person is as though the whole
of humanity has been killed'. That does not sound like an
extremist to me. Hypocritical and unjust, not even an appeal was
allowed Britain and its ally has created the world we live in. We
have nurtured those who do others harm when it has suited our
purposes. We have bombed and killed them at will as we saw fit. We
have allied ourselves with the Neo-Cons in the USA in
Empire-building in the guise of a War on Terror. The world is as
it is, because we have demonised those who don't hold our
'values'. If our Government has demonstrated our values over the
past decades, I for one am glad there are people out there who
don't share them..... Corruption, lying, deceit,
war-mongering.....We should be seeking them out and giving them
money in the bucketful. God Bless Us!! May said it was important
to draw a distinction between speakers who expressed disagreeable
views and speakers who were unlawful in terms of inciting violence
or terrorism. According to the Guardian, people from minorities
are up to 42 times more likely than native Brits to be the target
of a counter-terrorism power which allows the stopping and
searching of the innocent yet grants them less right than
suspected criminals. Asif Ahmad alleges that he was questioned by
M15 and asked to spy on others in his community and report to the
agency.
So long as anti-Muslim, Jewish, EDL and BNP groups are allowed to
address meetings on universities there can be no objection to the
Muslims doing the same. All should be treated equally. The police
should be invited to witness all these kinds of activities and
close them down if they think a breach of the peace is threatened.
Regardless of the subject, or any personal feelings we might have
about it, we have to work on the principle that freedom of speech
is total, or we simply do not possess it. I understand that
Voltaire's position on this issue was described as being something
along the lines of:"I disagree with what you say, but I will
defend to the death your right to say it." I think in this he was
completely correct.
British schooling has been producing young Muslims full of anger,
frustration and extremism, thanks to state schools with non-Muslim
monolingual teachers. British schooling is the home of
institutional racism and British teachers are chicken racist. They
are not role models for bilingual Muslim children during their
developmental periods.
British schooling and the British society is the home of
institutional racism. BNP, EDL and all other main political
parties are the true photo of the racist British society. Why not
NATO and the other entire WATCH DOGS group impose sanction on
England, for not doing anything to tackle the racism in their
Country. These so-call organisations can interfere with the Middle
East Countries, to rape the people of their OIL! But can’t do
anything about the racism and exploitation of minority groups in
England. When these society oppress some groups, and unleash the
monster them, and the people retaliate, then they call them
terrorist! Need some serious pro-action instead of reaction.
A HEAD teacher who subjected staff, governors and parents to a
torrent of racist and rude abuse has been banned from teaching.
Simon Parker, the former head of Coppice Primary School, in
Manford Way, Chigwell, called a supply teacher a "black *****" and
pulled his eyes sideways in an impression of a Chinese nursery
adviser.
The staffs at Gendale Primary in Pollokshield, where Muslim
children are in majority, are being asked to look for signs of
radicalisation. It is an incredibly worrying development. We
cannot have a culture of teachers spying on Muslim children as
young as five. Racism is very ripe in Scottish schools and
society. Muslim and other minority children have been victim of
racism in all walks of life. LAs and schools are trying their best
to hide this issue under the carpet. Hardly anybody was convicted
or imprisoned by the Authorities. What do you expect from Muslim
youths when they have been victim of racism throughout their
development periods? Now Muslim youths are victim of terrorism.
Thousands of them are being searched in streets and hundreds of
them are behind the bar without any trials.
Because of racism in British schooling, Muslim children are unable
to develop self-confidence and self-esteem, therefore, majority of
them leave schools with low grades. Racism is deeply rooted in
British society. Every native child is born with a gene or virus
of racism, therefore, no law could change the attitudes of racism
towards those who are different. It looks to me that British
society does not want Muslims in the West since it sees them only
as a problem?
The Muslims don’t want to integrate or abide by western law. Just
because they don´t want to wear nude clothes or at least cloth
that can show how big her breast are... so these people failed to
integrate. Just because they don't like free sex, consider dogs
and pigs as unclean animals, eat halal meat, then these people
failed again. What a dirty Bush mind you have!
Bilingual Muslim children need state funded Muslim schools with
bilingual Muslim teachers as role models during their
developmental periods. They need to learn and be well versed in
Standard English to follow the National Curriculum and go for
higher studies and research to serve humanity. At the same time,
they need to learn and be well versed in Arabic, Urdu and other
community languages to keep in touch with their cultural roots and
enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry. There are
hundreds of state and church schools where Muslim children are in
majority. In my opinion, all such schools may be opted out as
Muslim Academies.
The writer is
associated with London School of Islamics. He can be reached at
london_school_of_islamics@btinternet.com.
|