|
Every time Narendra Modi’s Gujarat
finds itself in the negative spotlight, his apologists have a
stock response: “But look at the spectacular economic growth the
state has made under his visionary leadership. Look at the
economy. Look at the industrial growth, jobs, prosperity created
by the vibrant Gujarat over the past 10 years!”
This yarn about the “vibrant Gujarat” has been going on for so
long that it has begun to stink now. As eminent historian Achyut
Yagnik pointed out a couple of years ago, Gujarat has always been
ahead of the rest of the country in terms of industrialization,
economic growth and development thanks to the pioneering spirit of
its enterprising people who have been doing business with the
world since long before the British hung up their boots and left.
It has nothing to do with Modi or his miraculous reign.
Even if you accept the claim about Gujarat’s fabled progress under
his blessed leadership, what does it prove? Does it somehow
justify his crimes against humanity and absolve him of
responsibility for the pogrom orchestrated by his administration
and party ten years ago?
Under Hitler, Germany developed and prospered even faster despite
the all-round destruction of the World War I — only to emerge as a
clear and present danger to the whole of Europe and civilized
world. It was in an economically resurgent Germany that millions
of Jews and gypsies were sent to their death. But clearly, as our
good friend Goebbels argued, a lie acquires the sanctity of truth
when repeated with conviction and a straight face.
And like all good, old, free market believers with a nose for
business, the British have concluded that it’s time to accept
Modi’s truth and do business with him. Ultimately, as Lord
Palmerston emphasized, England has no perpetual friends or
enemies, only permanent interests. And this apparently holds true
for their colonial cousins across the Atlantic as well.
So it makes sense that after 10 years of grandstanding over
Gujarat and shunning Modi, it’s business as usual for the world
powers. Goes out the window all the talk about justice, respect
for human rights and upholding the rule of law. So what if some of
those hacked and burned to death during the 2002 carnage happened
to be British citizens?
Soon after the massive media and PR machine that has successfully
built the cult of Narendra Modi went into an overdrive proudly
splashing the images of a grinning British ambassador James Bewan
with the chief minister, the Americans rushed in to embrace him.
US Assistant Secretary of State Robert Blake says that Modi, who
has been repeatedly denied permission to visit the land of the
free because of the Gujarat 2002, is “now free to apply for
another visa whenever he chooses.” The US official added: “We have
very good relations with Gujarat. Obviously, it is a very, very
important market for American companies.”
Ah! That explains it. In the end, it’s the almighty market that
really matters for the empire and other lesser mortals. A Sunday
Guardian report claims that the Gujarat CM met 25 ambassadors this
year as he relentlessly markets himself with the help of big
business and a servile, fawning media as the ultimate hope and
future of the world’s greatest democracy.
In a world weary of the continuing economic uncertainty, everyone
is desperate for crumbs wherever they could find them and Gujarat
has plenty to offer. And it’s not just the West that is keen to
accommodate the “visionary leader,” as a Gujarat government
website describes him. The annual Modi love-fest held with great
pomp in the name of “Vibrant Gujarat” using public funds is now
attended by representatives and investors from some Muslim
countries as well.
And if you go by the nightly debates on our television news
networks and tweets and readers’ comments in the media, you get
the impression the rich and middle class India cannot wait to
replace the dithering, discredited Manmohan Singh with a “decisive
and efficient administrator” that Modi is supposed to be.
If the Gujarat satrap wins tomorrow, he will have no one to thank
but Singh and the numerous multibillion dollar scams that the
Congress and its allies have gifted the nation over the past year
or two with such fascinating frequency — almost on a weekly basis.
The middle classes do not seem to be too troubled by the
oppressive shadow of their hero’s inconvenient past that
perpetually hovers over him no matter how hard he tries to shrug
it off.
The fact that his hands are soaked in the blood of thousands of
innocents seems to be of no consequence to his legion of admirers.
One of his senior ministers and close associates Maya Kodnani has
been handed a rare sentence of 28 years in prison. Another fellow
traveler, Babu Bajrangi, has been given incarceration until death.
The duo directed and executed with clinical precision (Kodnani is
a trained physician!) the Naroda Patiya massacre in which 97
Muslims perished, including pregnant women and infants. They
didn’t spare even fetuses in mothers’ wombs.
A citizens’ tribunal recorded that “(when) six-year-old Irfan
asked for water, his assailants made him forcibly drink kerosene,
or some other inflammable liquid, before a lit match was thrown
inside his gullet to make him explode within!”
This is but just one tiny footnote in the long saga of incredible
cruelty and depravity that went on for months even as the rest of
the country and the world watched in helpless, morbid fascination.
And we want the man who presided over this as our next leader?
How does someone with such toxic legacy and hateful agenda get to
lead the nation of a billion people and a million identities? How
did Gandhi’s nation end up here?
In democracies around the world, a whiff of a scandal or even a
rumor is enough to ruin many a political career and prospects of
office.
Senior Congress politicians like Jagdish Tytler, Sajjan Kumar and
Lalit Maken have been denied tickets and dumped by their party for
their role in the 2004 anti-Sikh riots following Indira Gandhi’s
assassination.
And here we are dying to gift the highest office in the land to
someone who didn’t just order and sanction the killing of
thousands of innocent people and collective punishment of an
entire community for an imagined sin, he remains singularly
unrepentant and brazen about the whole bloody business.
Then there are those, including “moderates” like Zafar Sareshwala,
who never tire of lecturing Muslims to “move on” and forgive and
forget in the name of Modi’s stunning accomplishments. Now
forgiveness is a noble thing but who are you and me to forgive and
forget? Have you asked the victims if they would like to “forgive
and forget” and move on?
Why do you think the victims of 1984 Sikh pogrom and other such
numerous atrocities haven’t moved on after all these years?
Because without justice and some semblance of retribution, it’s
impossible to move on. Time stands still for the victims and their
wounds turn into festering sores even though the world around them
may have shrugged and moved on. Justice alone is the balm that
heals the wounds inflicted by the past.
Aijaz Zaka Syed is
widely published and read writer based in Gulf. The above article
first published by Arab News.
He can be contacted at aijaz.syed@hotmail.com
|
Comments
|
Quick links