|
 |
|
 Another
Mosque proposal in US faces opposition: Heated
debate over the nature of Islam is overshadowing plans to build a
mosque in northeast Temecula ......
Read Full |
|
|
Washington:
The Obama administration recently moved to drop rhetorical
references to Islamic radicalism from official speech, and this
change can now be seen all the way down to the US military.
President Barack Obama has argued that words matter, and
administration officials have said that the use of inflammatory
descriptions linking Islam to the terror threat feed the enemy's
propaganda and may alienate moderate Muslims in the US.
Obama reached out to Muslim countries soon after taking office, and
made it clear it was one of his early priorities as president. He
has praised Islam and its contributions to American life. His new
NASA director, Charles Bolden, recently said one of his agency's
goals was to reach out to Muslims "and engage much more with
dominantly Muslim nations."
The question of how to frame the conflict against Al-Qaeda and other
terrorists has not been easy, especially as the US is trying to mend
fences with Muslim communities while toughening its position against
militant groups.
As it unveiled its new National Security Strategy last May,
administration officials said the shift in emphasis was critical in
undercutting Al-Qaeda's efforts to portray its attacks on the US and
the west as a justified holy war.
Terror leaders "play into the false perception that they are
religious leaders defending a holy cause, when in fact they are
nothing more than murderers, including the murder of thousands upon
thousands of Muslims," said top administration counterterrorism
deputy John Brennan during a recent speech explaining the policy
shift.
He added that "describing our enemy in religious terms would lend
credence to the lie propagated by Al-Qaeda and its affiliates to
justify terrorism that the United States is somehow at war against
Islam."
"The reality, of course, is that we have never been and will never
be at war with Islam. After all, Islam, like so many faiths, is part
of America."
Larry Korb, a military analyst at the Center for American Progress,
told reporters that Brennan is correct to avoid linking Islam to
terrorism.
"Once you attach a religious thing, you're basically saying somehow
or other this is caused by religion. Most Muslims are not that way,"
said Korb.
"If you put that term (Islamic terrorist) on there, it causes you
more problems in the long run. You don't want to see this as a war
on 'the Muslim world."
When asked how he would define the enemy, Korb told reporters: "Al
Qaeda. That's what we went in there for."
This train of thought is similar to Brennan's who said that
describing the enemy as Islamists "would actually be
counterproductive.
It would play into the false perception that they are religious
leaders defending a holy cause, when in fact they are nothing more
than murderers, including the murder of thousands upon thousands of
Muslims."
The US military is also trying to figure out where to draw this fine
line.
America's new top commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David Petraeus,
wrote the counterinsurgency manual back in 2006, during the Bush
Administration, referred to "Islamic insurgents," "Islamic
extremists" and "Islamic subversives."
But Gen. James Mattis, who was recently picked to head Central
Command, where he will oversee US military operations in Afghanistan
and Pakistan, as well as across the Middle East, including Iraq and
Iran, is well-known for his understanding of the Muslim world.
Mattis who led the Marine offensive to subdue the Iraqi city of
Fallujah in 2004, during the height of the insurgency has
deliberately chosen not to use phrases like "Islamic fundamentalist"
or "jihadist" when describing who the military is fighting.
He calls them, simply, "the enemy" and sees them as the newest in a
long line of foes the nation has faced.
"This is an enemy, I want to remind you, who has killed more Muslims
than he's killed Jews or Christians or Hindus. It's an enemy who
knows he cannot win at the ballot box; that's why they use bombs.
They know that nobody is going to vote their medieval message in."
But several prominent counterterrorism experts, however, are
challenging the administration's shift in its National Security
Strategy, saying the terror threat should be defined in order to
fight it.
In the report, scheduled to be released this week, counterterrorism
experts from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy argue
that the US could clearly articulate the threat from radical Islamic
extremists "without denigrating the Islamic religion in any way."
In the report, obtained by The Associated Press, said the analysts
warn that US diplomacy must sharpen the distinction between the
Muslim faith and violent Islamist extremism, identify radicalizers
within Islamic communities and empower voices that can contest the
radical teachings.
|
Cops were
among anti-Sikh rioters in 1984: Witness: 
All-party
meet seeks independent probe into J&K civilian deaths: 
Maharashtra Assembly revokes suspension of MNS legislators:
Maharashtra
Legislative Assembly today revoked the suspension of four MNS
.....
PSLV
launch successful, 5 satellites placed in orbit: 
Comment on this article