| 
              New Delhi: The Supreme 
              Court has expressed "strong displeasure" over the manner in which 
              the Bihar government was treating school teachers, dragging them 
              to courts for 35 years instead of treating them honourably and 
              giving them an appropriate salary.
 "The state government must realise that in a country where there 
              is so much illiteracy, and where there are such a large number of 
              first-generation students, the role of the primary and secondary 
              teachers is very important," said the apex court bench of Justice 
              Surinder Singh Nijjar and Justice H.L. Gokhale in a recent 
              judgment.
 
 Pronouncing the judgment, Justice Nijjar said: "They have to be 
              treated honourably and given appropriate pay and chances of 
              promotion. It is certainly not expected of the state government to 
              drag them to the court in litigation for years together."
 
 The court said: "We do record our strong displeasure for the 
              manner in which the state of Bihar kept on changing its stand from 
              time to time. This is not expected from the state government."
 
 The court said this while allowing two petitions by the Bihar 
              State Government Secondary School Teachers Association which had 
              challenged the high court orders of Oct 31, 2007, and May 21, 
              2010, quashing the July 7, 2006, order of the governor merging the 
              teachers of the Subordinate Education Service (Teaching Branch) 
              male and female cadre into Bihar Education Service Class II.
 
 The merger was challenged by the Bihar Education Service 
              Association, giving rise to a third round of litigation.
 
 The apex court also took exception to the manner in which the 
              Bihar High court allowed the reopening of the issue, which had 
              been decided twice by the apex court, in earlier rounds of 
              litigation.
 
 "The manner in which the learned Single Judge proceeded with... to 
              reopen the entire controversy, and also the Division Bench... in 
              approving that approach is also far from satisfactory," the apex 
              court observed.
 
 Holding that the single judge of the high court had no business to 
              re-open the entire controversy with Bihar Education Service 
              Association challenging the merger, the apex court said: "The law 
              of finality of decisions which is enshrined in the principle of res judicata (matter already judged) or principles analogous 
              thereto, does not permit any such re-examination, and the learned 
              Judge clearly failed to recognise the same."
 
 "If the orders passed by this court were not clear to the state 
              government or any party, it could have certainly approached this 
              Court for clarification thereof. But it could not have set up a 
              contrary plea in a collateral proceeding," the judgment said, 
              adding: "We do not expect such an approach from the state 
              government, and least from the High Court."
 
 The Bihar government had set up a three-member committee in March 
              1976 to recommend as to how the stagnation in government services 
              could be removed and promotional opportunities enlarged.
 
 The committee in its report said that its recommendations should 
              come into effect from January 1977.
 
 Accepting the recommendations of the committee, the Bihar 
              government issued a notification on April 11, 1977, and it was 
              gazetted April 27, 1977.
 
 The judgment extracted two paragraphs of the government decision 
              July 3, 2007, which said that in the year 1977 the total number of 
              created/sanctioned posts of male and female teachers were 2,465, 
              against which total working strength was 1,336. This decreased to 
              880 by the years 2006, and of this, if 301 units belonging to 
              Jharkhand are deducted, the total comes to only 579.
 
 The number of teachers in schools were counted to assess the 
              financial burden on the state exchequer on account of the 
              implementation of the decision.
 
 
 
 
              
              
 
 
 
              
 |